4.4 Review

Review of the status and mass changes of Himalayan-Karakoram glaciers

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 243, 页码 61-74

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.86

关键词

climate change; glacier fluctuations; glacier hydrology; glacier monitoring; mountain glaciers

资金

  1. INSPIRE Faculty award from Department of Science and Technology (India) [IFA-14-EAS-22]
  2. French Space Agency (CNES) through the TOSCA program
  3. French Space Agency (CNES) through the ISIS program
  4. Programme National de Teledetection Spatiale (PNTS) [PNTS-2016-01]
  5. NASA's High Mountain Asia Team
  6. JSPS-KAKENHI [26257202]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26257202] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comprehensive review of the status and changes in glacier length (since the 1850s), area and mass (since the 1960s) along the Himalayan-Karakoram (HK) region and their climate-change context. A quantitative reliability classification of the field-based mass-balance series is developed. Glaciological mass balances agree better with remotely sensed balances when we make an objective, systematic exclusion of likely flawed mass-balance series. The Himalayan mean glaciological mass budget was similar to the global average until 2000, and likely less negative after 2000. Mass wastage in the Himalaya resulted in increasing debris cover, the growth of glacial lakes and possibly decreasing ice velocities. Geodetic measurements indicate nearly balanced mass budgets for Karakoram glaciers since the 1970s, consistent with the unchanged extent of supraglacial debris-cover. Himalayan glaciers seem to be sensitive to precipitation partly through the albedo feedback on the short-wave radiation balance. Melt contributions from HK glaciers should increase until 2050 and then decrease, though a wide range of present-day area and volume estimates propagates large uncertainties in the future runoff. This review reflects an increasing understanding of HK glaciers and highlights the remaining challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据