4.4 Article

Do small businesses still prefer community banks?

期刊

JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 264-278

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.016

关键词

Banks; Relationships; Small business; Government policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We formulate and test hypotheses about the role of bank type - small versus large, single-market versus multimarket, and local versus nonlocal banks - in banking relationships. The conventional paradigm suggests that community banks - small, single-market, local institutions - are better able to form strong relationships with informationally opaque small businesses, while megabanks - large, multimarket, nonlocal institutions - tend to serve more transparent firms. Using the 2003 Survey of Small Business Finance (SSBF), we conduct two sets of tests. First, we test for the type of bank serving as the main relationship bank for small businesses with different firm and owner characteristics. Second, we test for the strength of these main relationships by examining the probability of an exclusive relationship and main bank relationship length as functions of main bank type and financial fragility, as well as firm and owner characteristics. The results are often not consistent with the conventional paradigm, perhaps because of changes in lending technologies and deregulation of the banking industry. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据