期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 57-62出版社
KERMAN UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61
关键词
Consumer Participation; Health Policy; Decision-Making; Public Preferences; Citizens' Jury (CJ); Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
资金
- Australian Research Council Linkage [LP100200446]
- Queensland Government Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland Health and Griffith University
- Australian Research Council [LP100200446] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens' Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is derived, its application in healthcare, and critique the information it can provide for decision-makers. We conclude that combining deliberation of an informed public via CJs and quantification of preferences using DCE methods, whilst it remains to be tested as an approach to engaging the public in priority-setting, could potentially achieve much richer information than the application of either method in isolation.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据