4.6 Article

Trends in health-care costs and utilization for inflammatory bowel disease from 2010 to 2014 in Korea: A nationwide population-based study

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 847-854

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14027

关键词

administrative claims; cost and cost analysis; delivery of health care; health-care costs; health care; inflammatory bowel diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and AimData regarding health-care costs and utilization for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at the population level are limited in Asia. We aimed to investigate the nationwide prevalence and health-care cost and utilization of IBD in Korea. MethodsWe tracked the IBD-attributable health-care costs and utilization from 2010 to 2014 using the public dataset obtained from Korean National Health Insurance Service claims. We estimated the nationwide prevalence of IBD using population census data from Statistics Korea during the same period. ResultsIn total, 236106 IBD patients were analyzed. The estimated IBD prevalence significantly increased from 85.1/100000 in 2010 to 106/100000 in 2014. The overall annual health-care costs for IBD increased from $23.2 million (US dollars) in 2010 to $49.7 million in 2014 (P<0.001). During the same period, the health-care cost per capita also increased from $572.3 to $983.7 (P<0.001). The outpatient to total cost ratio increased from 45.5% in 2010 to 66.6% in 2014. Regarding health-care utilization, the outpatient to total days of service use ratio increased from 73.1% in 2010 to 76.9% in 2014. Of the total days of service used, the proportions of tertiary, general, and community hospitals increased significantly with a concomitant decrease in that of primary clinics (all P values <0.001). ConclusionsThis population-based study confirmed the steadily rising rate of prevalence of IBD in Korea. It also demonstrated that the shifting to outpatient care and advanced care settings are drivers for the dramatic increase in IBD-related health-care costs in Korea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据