4.5 Article

Impact of retort process on characteristics and bioactivities of herbal soup based on hydrolyzed collagen from seabass skin

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 55, 期 9, 页码 3779-3791

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-018-3310-z

关键词

Hydrolyzed collagen; Herbal soup; Retort; Antioxidative activity; Fibroblast proliferation; Collagen production

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. TRF Distinguished Research Professor Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impact of retort processing on the characteristics and bioactivity of herbal soup, based on hydrolyzed collagen from seabass fish skins, as sterilized health drink in glass bottles, was investigated. Retort processing was conducted at either 115 A degrees C or 121 A degrees C for 5, 7, 9 or 11 min (F-0 values) and compared to no retort processing. All retort processing conditions yielded sterile soups, but some differences in moisture content, pH, viscosity, UV-absorbance, browning index, fluorescence intensity, color, alpha-amino group and total reducing compound contents were observed, compared to those without retort processing. Retort processing enhanced antioxidative activity of herbal hydrolyzed collagen (HHC) soups, regardless of conditions. HHC soups with F-0 value of 7 at 115 A degrees C (115/7) and 121 A degrees C (121/7) showed significantly higher ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activities, ferric reducing antioxidant power and H2O2 scavenging activity, compared to others. Retort processing had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on the appearance, color, odor, viscosity, flavor, taste and overall perception of HHC soups. The 115/7 and 121/7 samples stimulated cell proliferation and enhance collagen production of L929 mouse fibroblast cells. It was therefore concluded that retort processing could be used for preparing sterilized HHC soup as a ready-to-serve functional drink that is both healthy and safe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据