4.6 Article

Contribution of 2-Propenesulfenic Acid to the Antioxidant Activity of Allicin

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 1265-1270

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14145

关键词

allicin; 2-propenesulfenic acid; thiosulfinate; cope elimination; alpha-sulfenyl proton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We re-examined the antioxidative mechanism of allicin as a radical scavenger on the basis of the reactivity toward 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and peroxyl radicals. Initially, it was found that allicin decomposed more rapidly in n-hexane and chlorobenzene than in acetonitrile, ethanol, and ethanol/water solutions and decomposed into ajoene and vinyldithiins in these solvents. Furthermore, the decomposition of allicin and the following formations of ajoene and vinyldithiins from allicin were accelerated by the reaction of allicin with DPPH and peroxyl radicals. These results show that 2-propenesulfenic acid, which arises by Cope elimination from allicin, is proposed to contribute to scavenge these radicals because ajoene and vinyldithiins were produced from allicin through the use of 2-propenesulfenic acid. Next, allicin was more effective at inhibiting the linoleic acid oxidation at 50 degrees C than at 30 degrees C and in cyclohexane than in acetonitrile. These results indicate that allicin decomposed rapidly at high temperatures in a hydrogen-bond-acceptor solution to 2-propenesulfenic acid. In addition, 2-propene-1-sulfinothionic acid S-methyl ester, which does not produce sulfenic acid through Cope elimination, has no activity against the radicals. On the other hand, methanesulfinothionic acid S-2-propenyl ester, which produces methanesulfenic acid through Cope elimination, has the same or increased activity as its allicin against the radicals. Based on these results, the Cope elimination product, sulfenic acid, from thiosulfinates with an alpha-sulfenyl proton was found to make a larger contribution to the radical scavenger than that of allicin itself.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据