4.7 Article

PTEN deletion in luminal cells of mature prostate induces replication stress and senescence in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 215, 期 6, 页码 1749-1763

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20171207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  3. Universite de Strasbourg
  4. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  5. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  6. Alsace Contre le Cancer
  7. Association pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs de la Prostate
  8. Centre d'Ingenierie Moleculaire Europeen
  9. French state funds through the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the frame program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02]
  10. Association pour la Recherche a l'IGBMC (ARI)
  11. Ministere de l'enseignement superieur et de la recherche
  12. Al Bizri Foundation
  13. China Scholarship Council
  14. Ecole de l'Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Liliane Bettencourt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic ablation of the tumor suppressor PTEN in prostatic epithelial cells (PECs) induces cell senescence. However, unlike oncogene-induced senescence, no hyperproliferation phase and no signs of DNA damage response (DDR) were observed in PTEN-deficient PECs; PTEN loss-induced senescence (PICS) was reported to be a novel type of cellular senescence. Our study reveals that PTEN ablation in prostatic luminal epithelial cells of adult mice stimulates PEC proliferation, followed by a progressive growth arrest with characteristics of cell senescence. Importantly, we also show that proliferating PTEN-deficient PECs undergo replication stress and mount a DDR leading to p53 stabilization, which is however delayed by Mdm2-mediated p53 down-regulation. Thus, even though PTEN-deficiency induces cellular senescence that restrains tumor progression, as it involves replication stress, strategies promoting PTEN loss-induced senescence are at risk for cancer prevention and therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据