4.7 Article

Peripheral PDGFRα+gp38+ mesenchymal cells support the differentiation of fetal liver-derived ILC2

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 215, 期 6, 页码 1609-1626

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20172310

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [15H01166]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [16764150]
  3. Heiwa Nakajima Foundation
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  7. [14J07705]
  8. [26293110]
  9. [24659373]
  10. [22229004]
  11. [16H02631]
  12. [25670235]
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H01166] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are derived from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) via several specific precursors, and the transcription factors essential for ILC2 differentiation have been extensively studied. However, the external factors regulating commitment to the ILC lineage as well as the sites and stromal cells that constitute the optimal microenvironment for ILC2-specific differentiation are not fully defined. In this study, we demonstrate that three key external factors, the concentration of interleukin 7 (IL-7) and strength and duration of Notch signaling, coordinately determine the fate of CLP toward the T, B, or ILC lineage. Additionally, we identified three stages of ILC2 in the fetal mesentery that require STAT5 signals for maturation: ILC progenitors, CCR9(+) ILC2 progenitors, and KLRG1(-) immature ILC2. We further demonstrate that ILC2 development is supported by mesenteric platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFR alpha)(+) glycoprotein 38 (gp38)(+) mesenchymal cells. Collectively, our results suggest that early differentiation of ILC2 occurs in the fetal liver via IL-7 and Notch signaling, whereas final differentiation occurs in the periphery with the aid of PDGFR alpha(+)gp38(+) cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据