4.7 Article

Dynamics of floret initiation/death determining spike fertility in wheat as affected by Ppd genes under field conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 69, 期 10, 页码 2633-2645

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery105

关键词

Floret development; floret survival; late reproductive phase; photoperiod insensitivity; stem elongation; Triticum aestivum

资金

  1. ADAPTAWHEAT, an EU project
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain [AGL2012-35300]
  3. University of Lleida
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000C0617, BBS/E/J/000PR9779, BBS/E/J/000CA471, BBS/E/J/000CA393, BBS/E/J/000PR9781] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As wheat yield is linearly related to grain number, understanding the physiological determinants of the number of fertile florets based on floret development dynamics due to the role of the particular genes is relevant. The effects of photoperiod genes on dynamics of floret development are largely ignored. Field experiments were carried out to (i) characterize the dynamics of floret primordia initiation and degeneration and (ii) to determine which are the most critical traits of such dynamics in establishing genotypic differences in the number of fertile florets at anthesis in near isogenic lines (NILs) carrying photoperiod-insensitive alleles. Results varied in magnitude between the two growing seasons, but in general introgression of Ppd-1a alleles reduced the number of fertile florets. The actual effect was affected not only by the genome and the doses but also by the source of the alleles. Differences in the number of fertile florets were mainly explained by differences in the floret generation/degeneration dynamics, and in most cases associated with floret survival. Manipulating photoperiod insensitivity, unquestionably useful for changing flowering time, may reduce spike fertility but much less than proportionally to the change in duration of development, as the insensitivity alleles did increase the rate of floret development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据