4.7 Article

Genetic variation in Sorghum bicolor strigolactones and their role in resistance against Striga hermonthica

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 2415-2430

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery041

关键词

Germination stimulant; parasitic weed; resistance; sorghum; Striga; strigolactones

资金

  1. Nuffic Fellowship Program, the Netherlands
  2. Wageningen sandwich fellowship
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [865.06.002, 834.08.001]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [670211]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorghum is an important food, feed, and industrial crop worldwide. Parasitic weeds of the genus Striga constitute a major constraint to sorghum production, particularly in the drier parts of the world. In this study we analysed the Striga germination stimulants, strigolactones, in the root exudates of 36 sorghum genotypes and assessed Striga germination and infection. Low germination-stimulating activity and low Striga infection correlated with the exudation of low amounts of 5-deoxystrigol and high amounts of orobanchol, whereas susceptibility to Striga and high germination stimulating activity correlated with high concentrations of 5-deoxystrigol and low concentrations of orobanchol. Marker analysis suggested that similar genetics to those previously described for the resistant sorghum variety SRN39 and the susceptible variety Shanqui Red underlie these differences. This study shows that the strigolactone profile in the root exudate of sorghum has a large impact on the level of Striga infection. High concentrations of 5-deoxystrigol result in high infection, while high concentrations of orobanchol result in low infection. This knowledge should help to optimize the use of low germination stimulant-based resistance to Striga by the selection of sorghum genotypes with strigolactone profiles that favour normal growth and development, but reduce the risk of Striga infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据