4.7 Article

Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of a standardizedextract of bis-iridoids from Pterocephalus hookeri

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 233-238

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.01.035

关键词

Pterocephalus hookeri; Antinociceptive; anti-inflammatory; bis-iridoids

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2016YSN09]
  2. Excellent Academic LeadersProgram of Shanghai [16XD1403500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673570]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Pterocephalus hookeri (C.B. Clarke) Hiieck, one of the most popular Tibetan herbs, has been widely applied in Tibetan medicine prescriptions. Chemical investigations have led to the isolation of many bis-iridoids. However, the pharmacological activities of bis-iridoid constituents of this plant have never been reported before. Aim of the study: This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of afraction of bis-iridoid constituents of P. hookeri (BCPH) in order to provide experimental evidence for its traditional use, such as for cold, flu, and rheumatoid arthritis. Materials and methods: The analgesic effects of BCPH were investigated using the hot-plate test and acetic acid induced writhing test. The anti-inflammatory activities were observed using the following models: carrageenin-induced edema of the hind paw of rats and xylene-induced ear edema in mice. The effects of dexamethasone administration were also studied. Results: BCPH significantly increased the hot-platepain threshold and reduced acetic acid-induced writhing response in mice. Moreover, BCPH remarkably inhibited xylene-induced ear edema and reduced the carrageenin-induced rat paw edema perimeter. Conclusion: The results reveal that BCPH has central, peripheral analgesic activities as well as anti-inflammatory effects, supporting the traditional application of this herb in treating various diseases associated with inflammation and pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据