4.2 Article

Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 between heavily polluted days and other days in Zhengzhou, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 188-198

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.05.006

关键词

PM2.5; Water soluble inorganic ions; Secondary organic carbon; CMB; Back trajectory analysis

资金

  1. MEPPRC [201409010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PM2.5 samples were collected in Zhengzhou during 3 years of observation, and chemical characteristics and source contribution were analyzed. Approximately 96% of the daily PM2.5 concentrations and annual average values exceeded the Chinese National Ambient Air Quality Daily and Annual Standards, indicating serious PM2.5 pollution. The average concentration of water-soluble inorganic ions was 2.4 times higher in heavily polluted days (daily PM2.5 concentrations > 250 mu g/m(3) and visibility <3 km) than that in other days, with sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium as major ions. According to the ratio of NO3/SO4, stationary sources are still the dominant source of PM2.5 and vehicle emission could not be ignored. The ratio of secondary organic carbon to organic carbon indicated that photochemical reactivity in heavily polluted days was more intense than in other days. Crustal elements were the most abundant elements, accounting for more than 60% of 23 elements. Chemical Mass Balance results indicated that the contributions of major sources (i.e., nitrate, sulfate, biomass, carbon and refractory material, coal combustion, soil dust, vehicle, and industry) of PM2.5 were 13%, 16%, 12%, 2%, 14%, 8%, 7%, and 8% in heavily polluted days and 20%, 18%, 9%, 2%, 27%, 14%, 15%, and 9% in other days, respectively. Extensive combustion activities were the main sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during the episode (Jan 1-9, 2015) and the total benzo[a]pyrene equivalency concentrations in heavily polluted days present significant health threat. Because of the effect of regional transport, the pollution level of PM2.5 in the study area was aggravated. (C) 2017 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据