4.2 Article

Removal of VOCs from gas streams with double perovskite-type catalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 205-216

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.10.012

关键词

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs); Toluene (C7H8); Double perovskite-type catalyst; Catalysis; Activation energy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Republic of China (ROC) [102WFA0700516]
  2. National Central University [105G910-9]
  3. Industrial Technology Research Institute [105G910-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Double perovskite-type catalysts including La2CoMnO6 and La2CuMnO6 are first evaluated for the effectiveness in removing volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and single perovskites (LaCoO3, LaMnO3, and LaCuO3) are also tested for comparison. All perovskites are tested with the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 30,000 hr(-1), and the temperature range of 100-600 degrees C for C7H8 removal. Experimental results indicate that double perovskites have better activity if compared with single perovskites. Especially, toluene (C7H8) can be completely oxidized to CO2 at 300 degrees C as La2CoMnO6 is applied. Characterization of catalysts indicates that double perovskites own unique surface properties and are of higher amounts of lattice oxygen, leading to higher activity. Additionally, apparent activation energy of 68 kJ/mol is calculated using Mars-van Krevelen model for C7H8 oxidation with La2CoMnO6 as catalyst. For durability test, both La2CoMnO6 and La2CuMnO6 maintain high C7H8 removal efficiencies of 100% and 98%, respectively, at 300 degrees C and 30,000 hr-1, and they also show good resistance to CO2 (5%) and H2O(g) (5%) of the gas streams tested. For various VOCs including isopropyl alcohol (C3H8O), ethanal (C2H4O), and ethylene (C2H4) tested, as high as 100% efficiency could be achieved with double perovskite-type catalysts operated at 300-350 degrees C, indicating that double perovskites are promising catalysts for VOCs removal. (c) 2017 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据