4.7 Article

Optimization of hydrogen and organic acids productions with autochthonous and allochthonous bacteria from sugarcane bagasse in batch reactors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 952-963

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.015

关键词

Cellulosic substrate; Central composite design; Fermentation; Endogenous bacteria; Sugarcane bagasse

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [142415/ 2014-6]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/06246-7]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/06246-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The individual and mutual effects of substrate concentration (from 0.8 to 9.2 g/L) and pH (from 4.6 to 7.4) on hydrogen and volatile fatty acids production from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) were investigated in batch reactors, using a response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD). The maximum of 23.10 mmoL H-2/L was obtained under optimized conditions of 7.0 g SCB/L and pH 7.2, at 37 degrees C through the acetic acid pathway (1.57 g/L). Butyric and succinic acids were the major volatile fatty acids (VFA) produced in the fermentation process (from 0.66 to 1.88 g/L and from 1.06 to 1.65 g/L, respectively). According to the results, the RSM and CCD were useful tools to achieve high hydrogen production rates using Clostridium, Bacillus and Enterobacter, identified by Illumina sequencing (16S RNAr) in the fermentative consortium, and Clostridium and Paenibacillus, autochthonous bacteria from SCB. Significant changes were observed in the microbial community according to the changes in the independent variables, since the genera in the central point condition (5.0 g SCB/L and pH 6.0) were Lactobacillus, Escherichia and Clostridium, and Bacteroides and Enterobacter, which were identified in the optimized condition (7.0 g SCB/L and pH 7.2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据