4.7 Article

Lead sorption by biochar produced from digestates: Consequences of chemical modification and washing

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 277-284

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.108

关键词

Biochar; Digestate; Sorption; Organic sludge; Lead

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [643071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objectives of this work are to investigate the consequences of different chemical treatments (i.e. potassium hydroxide (KOH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)) and the effect of biochar washing on the Pb sorption capacity. Biochars derived from sewage sludge digestate and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate were separately modified with 2 M KOH or 10% H2O2 followed by semi-continuous or continuous washing with ultrapure water using batch or a column reactor, respectively. The results showed that the Pb adsorption capacity could be enhanced by chemical treatment of sludge-based biochar. Indeed, for municipal solid waste biochar, the Pb maximum sorption capacity was improved from 73 mg g(-1) for unmodified biochar to 90 mg g(-1) and 106 mg g(-1), after H2O2 and KOH treatment, respectively. In the case of sewage sludge biochar, it increased from 6.5 mg g(-1) (unmodified biochar) to 25 mg g(-1) for H2O2 treatment. The sorption capacity was not determined after KOH treatment, since the Langmuir model did not fit the experimental data. The study also highlights that insufficient washing after KOH treatment can strongly hinder Pb sorption due to the release of organic matter from the modified biochar. This organic matter may interact in solution with Pb, resulting in an inhibition of its sorption onto the biochar surface. Continuous column-washing of modified biochars was able to correct this issue, highlighting the importance of implementing a proper treated biochar washing procedure. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据