4.6 Article

Mechanism of the Donghekou landslide triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake revealed by discrete element modeling

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 1195-1205

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-1195-2014

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 97-2116-M-002-022-, 99-2116-M-002-005-, 100-2116-M-002-004-]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41172193]
  3. Basic Scientific Funding of the Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration [IGCEA-1107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The huge Donghekou landslide was triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 with about 2.4x10(7) m(3) of rock displaced. The landslide is considered as an example of an earthquake-induced ejection event, where dislocated slope materials was expelled over a section of the slope, but the kinematic processes are not well understood. We used the 2-D granular discrete element method to characterize the kinematic behavior and mechanics of this ejection landslide. The initial boundary conditions were applied along the ball-wall contacts by using derived velocities integrated from strong motion data with a duration of 125 s, including the peak acceleration near the Donghekou area. The constraints were primarily determined from the final geometry of the landslide and geological structures to account for the actual landslide characteristics. Simulated results showed that the large local seismic acceleration and a free face under the sliding body, caused by the dip difference between the upper slide face and the natural slope, originated from the activation of the landslide. For the lower sliding body, its kinematic mechanism was changed during sliding. Initially it was a push-type landslide, and then gradually changed to a retrogressive landslide. The eroded bed on the slope during the landslide had the potential of slightly increasing the runout distance from 1435 to 1519 m, and was predicted in the numerical simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据