4.7 Article

A high-performance glucose/oxygen biofuel cell based on multi-walled carbon nanotube films with electrophoretic deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 823, 期 -, 页码 723-729

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.06.046

关键词

Biofuel cells; Electrophoretic deposition; MWCNT films; Electrode supports

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81660369, 21475144, 81673172]
  2. Major Basic Research Project of Shandong Province, China [ZR2018ZC0125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrode supports play a significant role in the assembly of high-performance biofuel cells (BFCs) since they connect the active center of biocatalysts and the charge collectors directly. In this manuscript, novel nanostructured multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) films were fabricated by electrophoretic deposition (EPD-MWCNT films) as electrode supports for high-performance BFCs. Flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent glucose dehydrogenase and laccase were modified on EPD-MWCNT films to fabricate the bioanodes and biocathodes, respectively, with Os-complexes as mediators. For comparison, drop-casted MWCNT films or buckypapers have been prepared and adopted for the construction of BFCs with the same biocatalysts. EPD-MWCNT films which have vegetable sponge-like networks should be the optimal electrode supports for glucose/O-2 BFCs with higher power density. The EPD-MWCNT films based glucose/O-2 BFC showed a high maximum power density of 0.43 +/- 0.03 mW cm(-2) and open circuit voltage of 0.59 V, which is significantly superior to those values of the BFCs based on drop-cast MWCNT films or buckypapers, contributing to the electrode supports of EPD-MWCNT films with vegetable sponge-like nanostructure. Moreover, the BFC retained 56% of its original power density even after continuous operation for 7 days. Our findings would open an avenue for the development of more efficient BFCs with EPD-MWCNT films as the electrode supports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据