4.7 Review

Capacitive deionization: Processes, materials and state of the technology

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 813, 期 -, 页码 178-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.024

关键词

CDI; Capacitive desalination; Deionization; Carbon-based electrodes; Electrode regeneration; Electrical double layers; Charge efficiency; Constant voltage; Constant current; Membranes; Metal oxides

资金

  1. Louisiana Board of Regents through Opportunities for Partnerships in Technology with Industry (OPT-IN) award [LEQSF-EPS(2015)-OPT-IN-48]
  2. College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capacitive deionization (CDI) is a novel technology that has been successfully utilized for many water treatment/purification applications. In many cases, the CDI technology has shown increased efficiency compared to the other contemporary technologies. There have been some recent developments in this field that have enhanced the overall adsorption capacity and thus performance of CDI. Different types of carbon electrodes, such as conventional and latest forms of porous-carbon and graphene based electrodes have been used in the CDI technology. This has facilitated mass transfer in the form of adsorption of salt ions onto modified electrodes and increased the effectiveness of CDI operations. This paper aims to assess the overall state of the CDI technology and review basic concepts, saturation-regeneration of CDI electrodes, and various types of materials used for electrodes. In addition, this article reviews the recent progress made in electrode surface modifications by metals or metal oxides, membrane, polymer, organics and other compounds that have resulted in increased efficiency of ion extraction from the water. The evaluation of past and present published research on use of low-cost carbon forms as CDI electrodes to reduce the overall cost and eliminate the need of regeneration of saturated electrodes is also a part of the article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据