4.7 Article

Electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer/reduced graphene oxide composite for simultaneous determination of uric acid and tyrosine

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 813, 期 -, 页码 75-82

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.022

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymer; Reduced graphene oxide; 2-amino-5-mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole; Uric acid; Tyrosine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81503037]
  2. Basic research projects of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education [2017LQN06]
  3. Doctoral Research Funding of Liaoning Province [201601141]
  4. Career Development Support Plan for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Shenyang Pharmaceutical University [ZQN2015029]
  5. Scientific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education Department of China [L2014385]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reported a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) composite for simultaneous determination of uric acid and tyrosine. The MW layer was electropolymerized on the RGO modified electrode using a novel monomer of 2-amino-5-mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole and the dual template of uric acid and tyrosine. The integration of MIP with RGO resulted in the regular nanostructure and large surface area of the sensing interface. The sensing mechanism of the sensor can be explained by first recognizing the target molecules and then catalyzing the oxidation reactions on the MIP/RGO composite. The, electrochemical behavior of uric acid and tyrosine on the MIP/RGO composite was evaluated. Influencing factors, including the electropolymerization scanning cycles, monomer/template ratio, and pH values were optimized. Under the optimal condition, the sensor exhibits wide linear ranges for uric acid (0.01 mu M-100 mu M) and tyrosine (0.1 mu M-400 mu M) with detection limits of 0.0032 mu M and 0.046 mu M, respectively. In addition, this MIP/RGO composite was applied to detect uric acid and tyrosine in serum and urine samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据