4.6 Article

Biology, Thermal Requirements, and Estimation of the Number of Generations of Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 111, 期 5, 页码 2192-2200

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy162

关键词

coffee berry borer; thermal requirement; Geographic Information System

资金

  1. program PEC-PG (Programa de Estudantes convenio de pos-graduacao) of CAPES/CNPQ Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coffee culture, one of the main agricultural activities in Brazil, has undergone recent negative impacts due to unfavorable climate conditions, with a subnormal rainy period and increased temperatures during the second half of 2015. The coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is one of the main insect pests of coffee crops worldwide.The present research aimed to determine the climate zones for coffee berry borer in the state of Sao Paulo, based on its thermal requirements. The results showed that the mean biological development time of H. hampei was affected by temperature, completing its life cycle more rapidly in increased temperatures until the 30 degrees C threshold temperature, and more slowly above this temperature. Development time (egg-adult) was inversely related to temperature in the range between 18 and 32 degrees C.The temperature threshold (T-t) was 13.9 degrees C and the thermal constant (K) was 299 degree-days.These laboratory estimates of thermal requirements and the Geographic Information System (GIS) were used to generate insect life span distribution maps for Sao Paulo. In this state, the coffee berry borer can produce 5.09-10.53 generations annually. Higher pest incidences should coincide with both temperature increases and the availability of coffee fruit for infestation.The data obtained can be used to estimate the monthly and yearly number of generations of this pest, for use in integrated pest management programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据