4.6 Article

Age-Associated Changes in the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Head

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 5134-5143

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14303

关键词

aging; RNFL; neuroretinal rim; vasculature

资金

  1. National Institues of Health, National Eye Institute [K23 EY021761, R01 EY001139, T35 EY007088, P30 EY007551]
  2. John and Rebecca Moores Professorship, through the University of Houston

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and neuroretinal rim (NRR) parameters are often used as a surrogate for retinal ganglion cell content. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between these morphological measures and the aging effects on these structures. METHODS. One hundred thirteen healthy individuals, aged 19 to 76 years, with no prior history of retinal of optic nerve head pathology were recruited. A circumpapillary and radial OCT scan centered on the optic nerve head (ONH) was used for data analysis. Transverse scaling was calculated for each subject using measures from optical biometry. Custom algorithms were used for morphological analysis of the ONH NRR and RNFL that included quantification of major retinal vascular contribution. RESULTS. There was a significant age-related loss of RNFL thickness (-0.23 mu m/y, R-2 = 0.24, P < 0.01), major retinal vascular contribution (-0.03 mu m/y, R-2 = 0.07, P = 0.01, neural rim volume (NRV, -0.004 mm(3)/y, R-2 = 0.15, P < 0.01), and minimum rim width (MRW, -1.77 mu m/y, R-2 = 0.23, P < 0.01) before, and after, incorporating the Bruch's membrane opening size (sMRW, -1.86 mu m/y, R-2 = 0.22, P < 0.01). When normalized, the rates of change for ONH NRR parameters (NRV, 0.69%/y and sMRW, 0.50%/y) exceeded that of RNFL thickness (0.19%/y, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. Although both RNFL and ONH NRR parameters contain axons of retinal ganglion cells, there are differences in age-related changes in these measures that should be considered in clinical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据