4.4 Article

Towards establishing a combined rate law of nucleation and crystal growth - The case study of gypsum precipitation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 485, 期 -, 页码 28-40

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.12.037

关键词

Growth models; Nucleation; Stirring; Growth from solutions; Gypsum; Rate law

资金

  1. Rieger Foundation's JNF Program for Environmental Studies
  2. Israeli Ministry of National Infrastructures and Water and Energy resources [ES-32-2012]
  3. Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology Space

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main obstacle in the formulation of a quantitative rate-model for mineral precipitation is the absence of a rigorous method for coupling nucleation and growth processes. In order to link both processes, we conducted a series of batch experiments in which gypsum nucleation was followed by crystal growth. Experiments were carried out using various stirring methods in several batch vessels made of different materials. In the experiments, the initial degree of supersaturation of the solution with respect to gypsum (Omega(gyp)) was set between 1.58 and 1.82. Under these conditions, heterogeneous nucleation is the dominant nucleation mode. Based on changes in SO(4)(2 )concentration with time, the induction time of gypsum nucleation and the following rate of crystal growth were calculated for each experiment. The induction time (6-104 h) was found to be a function of the vessel material, while the rates of crystal growth, which varied over three orders of magnitude, were strongly affected by the stirring speed and its mode (i.e. rocking, shaking, magnetic stirrer, and magnetic impeller). The SO42 concentration data were then used to formulate a forward model that couples the simple rate laws for nucleation and crystal growth of gypsum into a single kinetic model. Accordingly, the obtained rate law is based on classical nucleation theory and heterogeneous crystal growth. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据