4.1 Article

Environmental DNA (eDNA) applications for the conservation of imperiled crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) through monitoring of invasive species barriers and relocated populations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 257-266

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jcbiol/ruy007

关键词

ark site; California; endangered crayfishes; Pacifastacus fortis; Pacifastacus leniusculus; translocation

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Hatch Project [1008988]
  2. UIUC STEM postdoctoral fellowship
  3. NIFA [913074, 1008988] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Native crayfish species often face competition and displacement by non-indigenous invasive crayfishes. Management responses implemented to preserve imperiled crayfishes may include the construction of physical barriers to prevent the spread of invasive crayfishes, and movement of native populations to ark sites that have not yet been invaded. These strategies require ongoing monitoring to determine their effectiveness. We propose that environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material identified from environmental samples, can be useful for assessing advancing invasions and imperiled freshwater species associated with management interventions. We monitored a series of management interventions intending to isolate the endangered Shasta crayfish Pacifastacus fortis (Faxon, l941) from the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852) in California, USA. We successfully detected P. fortis eDNA from two sites where it was known to occur, one site where its presence was uncertain, and one site (near an ark site) where it was believed absent. We also detected P. leniusculus eDNA from five sites it was known to occupy, but failed to detect its eDNA at two sites where it was believed to occur. We conclude with recommendations for improved eDNA monitoring of crayfish conservation and management interventions in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据