4.5 Article

Non-syndromic cleft lip and/or cleft palate: Epidemiology and risk factors in Lubumbashi (DR Congo), a case-control study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1051-1058

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.006

关键词

Cleft lip and/or cleft palate; Incidence; Risk factors; Lubumbashi (DR Congo)

资金

  1. ARES (Academie de Recherche et d'Enseignement Superieur)
  2. IRO, KU Leuven

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the incidence and risk factors of occurrence of non-syndromic cleft lip and/or cleft palate (NSCLP) in Lubumbashi. Method: A case-control study was conducted in the health district of Lubumbashi from February 2012 to December 2015. An exhaustive sampling, collecting all newborns with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL +/- P) in maternity wards was conducted. From a total of 172 cases, 162 non-syndromic cases were recruited. For each case, one clinically normal newborn control was selected. Results: NSCLP had an incidence of 1/1258 live births (0.8/1000). We found significant associations with a family history of cleft lip and palate (CLP) (x(2)family history = 11.5, p = 0.0007), maternal alcohol intake (OR = 19.3, 95% CI: 1.9-197.1), paternal alcohol during the periconceptional period and the first trimester of pregnancy (OR = 18.7, 95% CI: 3.9-89.2), maternal educational level lower than high school (OR = 9.5, 95% CI: 2.0-44.7), clay (Pemba) consumption during pregnancy (OR = 38.3, 95% CI: 9.3-157.0), the use of insecticides in the evening (OR = 130.3, 95% CI: 13.2-1286.9), indoor cooking with charcoal (Makala) (OR = 6.5, 95% CI: 1.22-34.5), and regular consumption of Kapolowe fish, supposedly contaminated with heavy metals (OR = 29.5, 95% CI: 7.4-116.7). Conclusion: Several environmental risk factors highly prevalent in Central Africa for facial clefting were found. (C) 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据