4.5 Review

Which antibiotic regimen prevents implant failure or infection after dental implant surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 722-736

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.02.004

关键词

Dental-implant surgery; Antibiotics; Amoxicillin; Implant failure; Implant loss; Postoperative infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess which antibiotic regimen prevents dental implant failures or postoperative infections following dental implant placement. Materials and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Pubmed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and EMBASE via OVID were searched up to August 2017. Only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) using antibiotics were included. Outcome measures were set on dental implant failures or postoperative infection incidence after dental implant surgery. Three reviewers independently undertook risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Stratified meta-analyses of binary data using fixed-effects models were performed using Stata 14.0. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results: Nine articles were included corresponding to 15 RCTs. All RCTs tested only oral amoxicillin. Implant-failure analysis: overall RR = 0.53 (P = .005, 95% CI: 0.34-0.82) and overall NNT = 55 (95% CI, 33-167). Single-dose oral amoxicillin preoperatively (SDOAP) is beneficial (RR = 0.50, CI: 0.29-0.86. P = .012), when compared to postoperative oral amoxicillin (POA): RR = 0.60, CI: 0.28-1.30. P = .197. Postoperative-infection analysis: overall RR = 0.76 (P = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.47-1.22). Neither SDOAP (RR = 0.82, CI = 0.46-1.45, P = .488) nor POA (RR = 0.64, CI = 0.27-1.51, P = .309) are beneficial. I-2 = 0.0%, chi-squared tests P approximate to 1. Conclusion: Only SDOAP is effective and efficacious at preventing implant failures, but it was not significant for postoperative infections following dental implant surgeries. (c) 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据