4.6 Article

Extended Higgs-portal dark matter and the Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/031

关键词

dark matter theory; dark matter experiments

资金

  1. MINECO, Spain [FPA2014-57816-P, FPA2016-78022-P]
  2. Centro de excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2014-0398, SEV-2016-0597]
  3. Programa FONDECYT Postdoctorado [3160153]
  4. Spanish FPI grant [SVP-2014-068899]
  5. Ramon y Cajal program of the Spanish MICINN
  6. Elusives European ITN project [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015//674896-ELUSIVES]
  7. SOM Sabor y origen de la Materia [PROMETEOII/2014/050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, we show that the Galactic Center Excess (GCE) emission, as recently updated by the Fermi-LAT Collaboration, could be explained by a mixture of Fermi bubbles-like emission plus dark matter (DM) annihilation, in the context of a scalar-singlet Higgs portal scenario (SHP). In fact, the standard SHP, where the DM particle, S, only has renormalizable interactions with the Higgs, is non-operational due to strong constraints, especially from DM direct detection limits. Thus we consider the most economical extension, called ESHP (for extended SHP), which consists solely in the addition of a second (more massive) scalar singlet in the dark sector. The second scalar can be integrated-out, leaving a standard SHP plus a dimension-6 operator. Mainly, this model has only two relevant parameters (the DM mass and the coupling of the dim-6 operator). DM annihilation occurs mainly into two Higgs bosons, SS -> hh. We demonstrate that, despite its economy, the ESHP model provides an excellent fit to the GCE (with p-value similar to 0.6-0.7) for very reasonable values of the parameters, in particular, ms similar or equal to 130 GeV. This agreement of the DM candidate to the GCE properties does not clash with other observables and keep the S - particle relic density at the accepted value for the DM content in the universe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据