4.6 Article

Seven lessons from manyfield inflation in random potentials

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/036

关键词

inflation; physics of the early universe; string theory and cosmology

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Centre [676]
  2. ERC Consolidator Grant STRINGFLATION under the HORIZON [647995]
  3. Stephen Hawking Advanced Fellowship at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology at the University of Cambridge
  4. BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant [ST/J005673/1]
  5. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1]
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1066293]
  7. STFC [ST/P000673/1, ST/L000636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P000673/1, ST/L000636/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study inflation in models with many interacting fields subject to randomly generated scalar potentials. We use methods from non-equilibrium random matrix theory to construct the potentials and an adaption of the 'transport method' to evolve the two-point correlators during inflation. This construction allows, for the first time, for an explicit study of models with up to 100 interacting fields supporting a period of 'approximately saddle-point' inflation. We determine the statistical predictions for observables by generating over 30,000 models with 2{100 fields supporting at least 60 efolds of inflation. These studies lead us to seven lessons: i) Many field inflation is not single-field inflation, i i) The larger the number of fields, the simpler and sharper the predictions, i i i) Planck compatibility is not rare, but future experiments may rule out this class of models, i v) The smoother the potentials, the sharper the predictions, v) Hyperparameters can transition from stiff to sloppy, v i) Despite tachyons, isocurvature can decay, v i i) Eigenvalue repulsion drives the predictions. We conclude that many of the 'generic predictions' of single-field inflation can be emergent features of complex inflation models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据