4.8 Review

Nose-to-brain drug delivery: An update on clinical challenges and progress towards approval of anti-Alzheimer drugs

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 139-177

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.011

关键词

Intranasal; Alzheimer; Galantamine; Deferoxamine; Risperidone; Donepezil

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (SERC Division), India [SR/FST/LSI434/2010]
  2. UGC-SAP (SAP II), New Delhi, India [3-54/2011]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India (Start-Up grant scheme) [SERB/LS-368/2013]
  4. Chhattisgarh Council of Science and Technology (CGCOST) (mini-research project (MRP)) [1124/CCOST/MRP/2015, 1115/CCOST/MRP/2015]
  5. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi [MRP-MAJOR-PHAR-2013-31484]
  6. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), New Delhi [8-126/RIFD/Policy-3/2013-14]
  7. National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institute of Health [SC3GM109873]
  8. Department of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, the USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the Alzheimer Association Report (2017), Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the 6th primary cause of death in the USA, which affects nearly 5.5 million people. In the year 2017 itself, the cost of AD treatment in the USA has been reported to rise to $ 259 billion. This statistic shows the severity of the disease in the USA which is very much similar across the globe. On the other hand, the treatment remains limited to a few conventional oral medications (approved by FDA). These are mainly acting superficially from mild to the moderate AD. The therapeutic efficacy of the drug is not only affected by its reduced concentration in the brain owing to the existence of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) but also due to its low brain permeability. In this context, the intranasal (IN) route of drug administration has emerged as an alternative route over the systemic (oral and parenteral) drug delivery to the brain. The delivery of the drug via an IN route offers various advantages over systemic drug delivery system, as it directly delivers the drug into the brain via olfactory route. Presence of drug in the olfactory bulb, in turn, increases the drug bioavailability in the brain and reduces the drug degradation as well as wastage of the drug through` systemic clearance. However, there is also some limitation associated with IN like poor drug permeation through the nasal mucosa and mucociliary clearance. The delivery system various through novel strategies (nano drug carrier system, colloidal carriers, mucoadhesive devices, controlled delivery system, pro-drug, etc.) are adapted to overcome the above-stated limitations. Although, after all, such successful research claims, very few of the nose-to-brain drug delivery of anti-AD drugs have gained market approval due to lack of sufficient clinical evidence. Onzetra Xsail (R) is one such marketed preparations approved for IN delivery used for the treatment of a brain disorder; migraine. In the field of patents also, no work is found which could present sufficient experimental findings to support its clinical safety profile. It also underlines the fact that majority of work related to the nose-to-brain delivery of anti-AD drugs is limited only up to preclinical studies. In this review article, we have discussed the latest works on various novel formulations loaded with various anti-Alzheimer agents. These agents include galantamine, deferoxamine, tacrine, tarenflurbil, rivastigmine, risperidone, curcumin, quercetin, piperine, insulin, etc. and various peptides towards the development of a promising IN drug delivery system for the treatment of AD. Through this review article, we want to drag the attention of the researchers working in this field towards the challenges and hurdles of practical applicability IN delivery of antiAD drugs. Moreover, the attention towards the clinical studies will ease the approval process for the administration of anti-Alzheimer drugs via IN route.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据