4.7 Article

Trends in stratospheric ozone derived from merged SAGE II and Odin-OSIRIS satellite observations

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 14, 期 13, 页码 6983-6994

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  2. Canadian Space Agency (CSA)
  3. Sweden (SNSB)
  4. Canada (CSA)
  5. France (CNES)
  6. Finland (Tekes)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stratospheric ozone profile measurements from the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II satellite instrument (1984-2005) are combined with those from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) instrument on the Odin satellite (2001-Present) to quantify interannual variability and decadal trends in stratospheric ozone between 60 degrees S and 60 degrees N. These data are merged into a multi-instrument, long-term stratospheric ozone record (1984-present) by analyzing the measurements during the overlap period of 2002-2005 when both satellite instruments were operational. The variability in the deseasonalized time series is fit using multiple linear regression with predictor basis functions including the quasi-biennial oscillation, El Nino-Southern Oscillation index, solar activity proxy, and the pressure at the tropical tropopause, in addition to two linear trends (one before and one after 1997), from which the decadal trends in ozone are derived. From 1984 to 1997, there are statistically significant negative trends of 5-10% per decade throughout the stratosphere between approximately 30 and 50 km. From 1997 to present, a statistically significant recovery of 3-8% per decade has taken place throughout most of the stratosphere with the notable exception between 40 degrees S and 40 degrees N below approximately 22 km where the negative trend continues. The recovery is not significant between 25 and 35 km altitudes when accounting for a conservative estimate of instrument drift.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据