4.6 Article

Improved Schmidt-hammer exposure ages for active and relict pronival ramparts in southern Norway, and their palaeoenvironmental implications

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 7-21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.002

关键词

Pronival (protalus) ramparts; Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating (SHD); Younger Dryas glacier limits; Periglacial environments; Late Weichselian and Holocene palaeoenvironments; Glacier-permafrost interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eight pronival (protalus) ramparts from alpine southern Norway were dated using Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating (SHD) based on local high-precision linear calibration equations. SHD ages were - 1355 +/- 1240 to 815 +/- 1000 years for three active ramparts and 8730 +/- 1050 to 14,635 +/- 1060 years for five relict ramparts. Different parts of the same rampart yielded ages that were in generally good agreement. R-value frequency distributions enabled the identification single-age and mixed-age boulder populations, and the differentiation of active and relict rampart surfaces. The relict ramparts are located outside Younger Dryas glacier limits and probably formed over a period of similar to 6000 years between deglaciation (following the Last Glacial Maximum of the late Weichselian, similar to 18,000 years ago) and the end of the Younger Dryas (similar to 11,700 years ago). At that time, glacial debuttressing and permafrost degradation apparently enhanced the release of rock debris from rock faces to the ramparts. The active ramparts, which are located in areas deglaciated after the Younger Dryas, are relatively uncommon in the study area due to diminished paraglacial effects and limited debris supply associated with seasonally frozen ground during the Holocene. Thus, the legacy of glaciers, glacier-permafrost interaction, and the specific type of periglacial environment must all be considered when assessing the palaeoenvironmental and palaeoclimatic significance of pronival ramparts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据