4.6 Article

Soil genesis and evolution on calanchi (badland-like landform) of central Italy

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 33-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.031

关键词

Soil morphology; Water retention; COLE; Salt leaching; NaCl; Clay dispersion

资金

  1. Cariverona Foundation [2007.1508]
  2. Marche Administrative Region (PSR Marche, Misura T)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calanchi are badland-like erosional landforms, common in the Mediterranean region, which form from accelerated erosion processes. The calanchi slopes, naked or differently vegetated, can be considered as formed by different ecological tesserae originated by the mutual interaction of several factors such as erosion, geomorphology, microclimatic conditions, vegetation, ground cover, and pedogenesis. However, information about pedogenesis is rather scarce mainly because the soils developing on calanchi slopes are incessantly disturbed by erosion processes. To understand the role of soil evolution on landslide erosion, we considered three land facets each one made up of four tesserae (T1 to T4), which represented the different steps of soil and vegetal evolution of calanchi. The soil of each tessera was described, sampled by genetic horizons, and the samples were characterized for their physical, mineralogical and chemical properties. Field observations and laboratory data suggest that pedogenesis in the calanchi badlands may progress until a critical threshold. Indeed, advanced plant colonization and solum development improve soil structure, increase soil organic matter, and favor redistribution of nutrients along the profile. The improvement of structure at depth fosters water storage and clay dispersion through soil leaching and reduction of ionic strength of the soil solution, making soil less stable. Depending on the slope gradient, the soil weight acquired during rainfall events may trigger landsliding, mudflows, or collapses that rejuvenate the surface. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据