4.7 Article

Hyaluronated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for active targeting: influence of conjugation method and hyaluronic acid molecular weight on the nanovector properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 516, 期 -, 页码 484-497

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.072

关键词

Hyaluronic acid; Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; CD44 receptor; Active targeting; Hydrophilicity; Infrared; Water adsorption; MSN

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR)-University of Turin, Fondi Ricerca Locale (ex-60%)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have prepared and evaluated the physico-chemical and biological properties of four different hyaluronated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) samples (MSN/HA). Hyaluronic acid (HA) with two different molecular weights (200 and 6.4 kDa) was used for the conjugation of aminopropyl-functionalized MSN (NH2-MSN), following two different procedures. Namely, samples HA200A and HA6.4A were prepared by reacting activated HA with NH2-MSN (method A), while samples HA200B and HA6.4B were obtained carrying out HA activation in the presence of the nanoparticles (method B). The four samples showed similar hydrophilicity, but clear differences in the HA loading, textural properties, surface charge and stability of the suspensions. More in detail, conjugation using low molecular weight HA with method A resulted in low HA loading, with consequent scarce effects on dispersity and stability in physiological media. The highest yield and corresponding best performances were obtained with method B using high molecular weight HA. HA loading and molecular weight also influenced in a concerted way the biological response towards the MSNs of CD44 target cancer cells (CD44(+)) and control cells (CD44(-)): MDA-MB-231 and A2780, respectively. The absence of cytotoxicity was assessed. Moreover, the targeting ability of the best performing MSN/HA was confirmed by cellular uptake studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据