4.7 Article

In situ characterization of low-viscosity direct ink writing: Stability, wetting, and rotational flows

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 529, 期 -, 页码 599-609

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.110

关键词

3D printing; Direct ink writing; Lubrication theory; Contact angle; Contact line

资金

  1. Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies from the U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-09-D-0001]
  2. UCSB
  3. NSF
  4. MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation [NSF DMR 1121053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: Direct ink writing (DIW) of composites can be coupled with magnetic, electric, or acoustic fields to control spatial variations of microstructure that enhance performance. The use of such external fields often requires inks with lower viscosities than conventional DIW, which presents new challenges with regards to maintaining the stability of printed lines and targeted microstructures. In-situ monitoring of the print bead, combined with slot-die models, can be used to predict printing modality and guide printing protocols for low viscosity inks. Experiments: Using videos of the nozzle-substrate gap, we systematically study how ink composition, stand-off distance, and nozzle and substrate surface coatings influence the printing process. We establish in-situ digital image analysis techniques to evaluate filament stability, nozzle wetting, and rotational flows in low viscosity composite inks. Findings: Variations in the fluid-substrate contact line position and angle can be used to evaluate stability on-the-fly, and lubrication theory can be used to predict filament-to-droplet transitions. To limit nozzle wetting and disruption of microstructures established in the nozzle, it is necessary to use low flow to stage speed ratios, in regimes close to those associated with instabilities. However, low viscosities, small stand-off distances, and functionalized nozzles can improve the print line's resilience against instabilities. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据