4.7 Article

The rheology of polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silica nanoparticles positioned at an air-aqueous interface

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 527, 期 -, 页码 346-355

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.035

关键词

Particle-stabilized foams; Interfacial shear rheology; Polymer-coated particles

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201406450027]
  2. Worldwide Universities Network (Researcher Mobility Award, University of Leeds)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle-stabilized emulsions and foams are widely encountered, as such there remains a concerted effort to better understand the relationship between the particle network structure surrounding droplets and bubbles, and the rheology of the particle-stabilized interface. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-coated silica nanopartides were used to stabilize foams. The shear rheology of planar particle-laden interfaces were measured using an interfacial shear rheometer and the rheological properties measured as a function of the sub phase electrolyte concentration and surface pressure. All particle-laden interfaces exhibited a liquid-like to solid-like transition with increasing surface pressure. The surface pressure-dependent interfacial rheology was then correlated to the formed micron-scale structures of the particle-laden interfaces which were imaged using a Brewster angle microscope. With the baseline knowledge established, foams were prepared using the same composite particles and the particle network structure imaged using cryo-SEM. An attempt has been made to correlate the two structures observed at a planar interface and that surrounding a bubble to elucidate the likely rheology of the bubble stabilizing particle network. Independent of the sub-phase electrolyte concentration, the resulting rheology of the bubble stabilizing particle network was strongly elastic and appeared to be in a compression state at the region of the L-S phase transition. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据