4.4 Article

The Dorsal Attention Network Reflects Both Encoding Load and Top-down Control during Working Memory

期刊

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 144-159

出版社

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01195

关键词

-

资金

  1. government of the French-speaking community of Belgium (ARC) [12/17-01-REST]
  2. Belgian Science Policy (Back-to-Belgium grant)
  3. Belgian Science Policy (Interuniversity Attraction Pole) [P7/11]
  4. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01 HD-21338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dorsal attention network is consistently involved in verbal and visual working memory (WM) tasks and has been associated with task-related, top-down control of attention. At the same time, WM capacity has been shown to depend on the amount of information that can be encoded in the focus of attention independently of top-down strategic control. We examined the role of the dorsal attention network in encoding load and top-down memory control during WM by manipulating encoding load and memory control requirements during a short-term probe recognition task for sequences of auditory (digits, letters) or visual (lines, unfamiliar faces) stimuli. Encoding load was manipulated by presenting sequences with small or large sets of memoranda while maintaining the amount of sensory stimuli constant. Top-down control was manipulated by instructing participants to passively maintain all stimuli or to selectively maintain stimuli from a predefined category. By using ROI and searchlight multivariate analysis strategies, we observed that the dorsal attention network encoded information for both load and control conditions in verbal and visuospatial modalities. Decoding of load conditions was in addition observed in modality-specific sensory cortices. These results highlight the complexity of the role of the dorsal attention network in WM by showing that this network supports both quantitative and qualitative aspects of attention during WM encoding, and this is in a partially modality-specific manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据