4.2 Article

Vitamin K1 and Vitamin K2 immunopharmacological effects on the peripheral lymphocytes of healthy subjects and dialysis patients, as estimated by the lymphocyte immunosuppressant sensitivity test

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12747

关键词

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; dialysis patient; lymphocyte immunosuppressant sensitivity test; peripheral blood mononuclear cells; vitamin K1; vitamin K2

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K08414]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What is known and objective Renal transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive therapy to prevent acute rejection. We evaluated the immunopharmacological efficacy of vitamin K1 (VK1) and vitamin K2 (VK2) on T-cell mitogen-activated-peripheral lymphocytes of dialysis patients and healthy subjects. MethodsResultsThe effects of VK1 and VK2 on the T-cell mitogen-stimulated proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 12 healthy subjects and 12 dialysis patients were estimated. Seven cytokines produced from the activated PBMCs were measured by a BD Cytometric Beads Array kit. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) in PBMCs were analysed as CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ lymphocytes by flow cytometry. VK2 dose-dependently suppressed the concanavalin A-stimulated proliferation of PBMCs from healthy subjects and dialysis patients, whereas VK1 had no significant effect on the PBMC proliferation. VK1 and VK2 did not influence the production of most of the Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines from the activated PBMCs of these subjects, although VK2 increased the IL-4 production from PBMCs of healthy subjects. The Treg percentages in the PBMCs of dialysis patients were markedly decreased compared to healthy PBMCs after the treatment with relatively low concentrations of VK2. What is new and conclusionThe present data suggest that VK2 has immunosuppressive efficacy. VK2 may enhance the immunosuppressive efficacies of glucocorticoids while preventing osteoporosis caused by glucocorticoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据