4.6 Article

The effect of decellularized tissue engineered constructs on periodontal regeneration

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 586-596

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12886

关键词

cell sheet; decellularization; perfusion; periodontal defect; periodontal ligament; polycaprolactone; tissue engineering

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1043994]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To evaluate the effect of decellularized tissue engineered constructs on cell differentiation in vitro and periodontal regeneration in vivo. Materials and Methods: Periodontal ligament cell (PDLC) sheets were loaded on polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds and then decellularized. Constructs were assessed for their effect on allogenic PDLC and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation in vitro, as evaluated by gene expression of bone and periodontal ligament tissue markers post-seeding. Expression of MSC marker STRO-1 was assessed by immunostaining. Decellularized constructs were evaluated in a rat periodontal defect model to assess their biocompatibility and tissue integration. Microcomputed topography (mu CT) and histological assessment were performed to assess the regenerative potential of the constructs at 2 and 4weeks postoperatively. Results: There was upregulation of bone marker gene expression by PDLCs especially on the 14th day. MSCs lacked bone markers expression, but showed increased collagen I marker expression on day 14. STRO-1 expression by the MSCs decreased over the three timepoints when seeded on decellularized sheets. Histological assessment demonstrated the biocompatibility of the decellularized constructs in vivo. More new attachment formation was observed on the decellularized constructs compared to scaffold only controls. Conclusion: Decellularized tissue engineered constructs are capable of inducing cell differentiation in vitro and have the potential to facilitate periodontal regeneration in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据