4.2 Article

Effects of a group physical activity program on physical fitness and quality of life in individuals with schizophrenia

期刊

MENTAL HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 155-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2014.07.002

关键词

Schizophrenia; Group physical activity program; Functional exercise capacity; Physical activity levels; Quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 16-week group physical activity (PA) program on physical fitness and quality of life in outpatients with schizophrenia. Methods: Nineteen outpatients with schizophrenia were divided into experimental (EG) (n = 8; mean age 39 7 years) and control (CG) (n = 11;. mean age 40 6 years) groups. The EG underwent twice a week sessions of a group PA program for a period of 16-week. The participants completed a battery of tests at baseline and after 16-week, which included the assessment of body composition (dual-energy Xray absorptiometry), functional exercise capacity (6MWT), physical activity levels (accelerometers), quality of life (WHOQOL-Brief), and anthropometric measures. During the program different strategies were implemented to ensure the participants' adherence. Results: The attendance to the program was 79.7%. In the EG a significant decrease was observed in hip circumference (p = 0.02); a significant increase occurred in moderate to vigorous physical activity (p = 0.05) and in the environment domain (WHOQOL-Brief) (p = 0.02). The improvement in environment domain scores was also associated with a decrease in sedentary behavior (r = 0.82, p = 0.01) in the EG. Conclusions: The strategies used during the program promoted a high rate of attendance. PA may have a positive impact on the participants' ability to perform activities of daily living. This study showed that a group PA program can be successfully implemented for outpatients with schizophrenia and can influence their quality of life and PA levels. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据