4.7 Article

THE TIP OF THE RED GIANT BRANCH DISTANCE TO THE PERFECT SPIRAL GALAXY M74 HOSTING THREE CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 792, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/52

关键词

galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: individual (M74); galaxies: stellar content; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (SN 2002ap, SN 2003gd, SN 2013ej)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korea Government (MSIP) [2013R1A2A2A05005120]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A2A05005120] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

M74 (NGC 628) is a famous face-on spiral galaxy, hosting three core-collapse supernovae (SNe): SN Ic 2002ap, SN II-P 2003gd, and SN II-P 2013ej. However, its distance is not well known. We present a distance estimation for this galaxy based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) method. We obtain photometry of the resolved stars in the arm-free region of M74 from F555W and F814W images in the Hubble Space Telescope archive. The color-magnitude diagram of the resolved stars shows a dominant red giant branch (RGB) as well as blue main sequence stars, red helium burning stars, and asymptotic giant branch stars. The I-band luminosity function of the RGB stars shows the TRGB to be at I-TRGB = 26.13 +/- 0.03 mag, and T-RGB = 25.97 +/- 0.03. From this, we derive the distance modulus to M74 to be 30.04 +/- 0.04 (random) +/- 0.12 (systematic) (corresponding to a linear distance of 10.19 +/- 0.14 +/- 0.56 Mpc). With this distance estimate, we calibrate the standardized candle method for SNe II-P. From the absolute magnitudes of SN 2003gd, we derive a value of the Hubble constant, H-0 = 72 +/- 6 (random) +/- 7 (systematic) km s(-1) Mpc(-1). It is similar to recent estimates based on the luminosity calibration of Type Ia supernovae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据