4.3 Article

Reduction of ipsilateral thalamic volume in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 76-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.06.025

关键词

Thalamus; Epilepsy; Duration; Atrophy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea [NRF-2017R1C1B5015871]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thalamus plays an important role in the modulation of both focal and generalized seizures, but the mechanisms related to seizures may be different among epilepsy syndromes. The aim of this study is to investigate the thalamic atrophy in different epilepsy syndromes. We enrolled a total of 72 patients with epilepsy (22 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis, 21 patients with extra temporal lobe epilepsy, and 29 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy). We analyzed structural volumes of the brain with FreeSurfer 5.1 software, and compared them among subgroups of epilepsy and normal control subjects. Moreover, we quantified correlations between the duration of epilepsy and the structural volumes with age and sex as covariates. The volumes of the ipsilateral hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis were significantly smaller than those in extra temporal lobe epilepsy and normal control subjects [analysis of variance (ANOVA), p < 0.0011. Although the volumes of the ipsilateral thalamus were not different from those of normal control subjects, the volumes of the ipsilateral thalamus were negatively correlated with duration of epilepsy in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (r = 0.5, p = 0.02). However, the volumes of interest in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy were not different from those in normal control subjects, and none of these structures were correlated with duration of epilepsy. These findings suggest that the role of the thalamus may be different in thalamo-limbic circuits among epilepsy syndromes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据