4.3 Article

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Accessibility Research and Evaluation (PrEPARE Study)

期刊

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1722-1725

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-014-0845-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U19 AI090970, AI043638, R21 AI080353, R24 AI106039, AI077304, AI007384, R01 AI047745, AI69432, R21 AI077304, R21 AI047745, P01 AI074621, AI090970, AI74621, U19 AI096113, AI100665, P30 AI036214, P01 AI080193, K24 AI100665, UM1 AI069432, AI096113, U01 AI069432, AI047745, AI080353, AI080193, AI36214, T32 AI007384, U01 AI043638, R56 AI047745] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA034978, DP1 DA034978] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM093939, R01 GM093939] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH083552, MH083552, MH62512, P30 MH062512] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) has demonstrated effectiveness as HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but it is not commonly prescribed. Our study was designed to determine the barriers preventing utilization of PrEP among men who have sex with men (MSM), the group at greatest risk for HIV infection in the United States. A population-based sample of MSM presenting for HIV testing at 'Early Test' HIV testing and counseling sites in San Diego, California were offered PrEP and education about potential efficacy. Eligible individuals reported having unprotected sex within the past 12 months and who tested negative for HIV were offered study participation. Despite offering procedures for evaluation and prescription for PrEP to 416 eligible subjects, less than 0.5 % of participants received the drug. Surveys collected from 54 of those who declined study participation revealed multiple barriers to PrEP among MSM including cost, low perceived risk of infection and concerns about taking a daily medication and potential long-term side effects. Efforts should be made to address these barriers, especially lowering the cost of TDF-FTC, education about PrEP side effects and awareness of HIV risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据