3.8 Article

Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Estimated by 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of Stage II or III Disease

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 187-195

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13139-014-0280-6

关键词

Diffuse large cell lymphoma; Metabolic tumor volume; Tumor burden; Prognosis; Positron-emission tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographycomputed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with rituximabcontaining immunochemotherapy. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who underwent pre-treatment torso FDG-PET/CT scan taken within 10 days before treatment were included. MTV was defined as the volume of hypermetabolic tissue with a standardized uptake value (SUV) greater than a threshold value of 2.5 and calculated using volume viewer software. Association of MTV with patient characteristics and survival were compared. Results A total of 96 patients were evaluated. During a median follow-up period of 27.8months, 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival was 69.5 % and 72.9 %, respectively. The Ann Arbor staging showed a limitation of prognosis because there was no difference of EFS between patients with Ann Arbor stage II and those with stage III. On the contrary, among patients with Ann Arbor stage II or III disease (n= 53), the higher MTV group showed significantly inferior EFS compared with the lower MTV group. Conclusions In the current study, we identified the pretreatment MTV measured by FDG-PET/CT as a potential predictor of survival in patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP), at least in Ann Arbor stage II and III disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据