4.3 Article

Outcomes of cervical laminoplasty-Population-level analysis of a national longitudinal database

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 66-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.089

关键词

Laminoplasty; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Decompression; Complications; MarketScan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Cervical laminoplasty is an important alternative to laminectomy in decompressing of the cervical spine. Further evidence to assess the utility of laminoplasty is required. We examine outcomes of cervical laminoplasty via a population level analysis in the United States. Methods: We performed a population-level analysis using the national MarketScan longitudinal database to analyze outcomes and costs of cervical laminoplasty between 2007 and 2014. Outcomes included postoperative complications, revision rates, and functional outcomes. Results: Using a national administrative database, we identified 2613 patients (65.6% male, mean 58.5 years) who underwent cervical laminoplasty. Mean length of stay was 3.1 +/- 2.8 days and mean follow-up was 795.5 +/- 670.6 days. The overall complication rate was 22.5% (N = 587), 30-day readmission rate was 7.5% (N = 195), and mortality rate was 0.08% (N = 2, elderly patients only). The complication rate was significantly increased in elderly patients (age >65 years) compared to non-elderly patients (OR 0.751, p < .01). The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during the cervical laminoplasty procedure did not significantly impact outcomes. The overall re-operation rate after the initial procedure was 10.9%. Total costs of cervical laminoplasty were mainly driven by hospital charges with physician-related payments comprising a small amount. Conclusions: Our national analysis of cervical laminoplasty found the procedure to be clinically effective with low complication rates and postoperative symptomatic improvement. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据