3.8 Article

The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly population

期刊

RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 296-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2014.04.005

关键词

Chronic obstructive pulmonary; disease; Elderly; Geriatric condition; Drug adherence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease and an important health care problem in older adults. The impact of age and specific geriatric issues on COPD in elderly patients has not been well established. Methods: A cross-sectional study of elderly COPD patients was conducted in Japan by using a regional COPD registry database. We compared indices of disease severity (pulmonary function, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations), presence of comorbidities, geriatric conditions (cognitive function, mental status, and activities of daily living [ADLJ), and adherence to prescribed drug regimens between elderly and younger patients with COPD. Results: In total, 279 patients with stable COPD (median age, 74 years) were identified; 86% of these patients were elderly (65 years of age or older). Elderly COPD patients, especially those who were 75 years of age or older, had significantly more cases of dyspnea, lower exercise tolerance, and poorer ADL and a higher incidence of severe exacerbations than younger patients (all P < 0.05). In addition, the prevalence of comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease and cancer, was significantly higher in elderly COPD patients. Elderly COPD patients had specific geriatric conditions, including cognitive impairment. Adherence to inhaled drug regimens in elderly patients was as favorable as that in younger patients. Conclusions: Age and specific geriatric conditions have a great negative impact on COPD in elderly patients. Geriatric conditions should be addressed in the management of elderly COPD patients. (C) 2014 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据