4.7 Article

Global perturbation of the carbon cycle at the onset of the Miocene Climatic Optimum

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 123-126

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G36317.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HO233/1, SFB 754 TP A7]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [244926/2013-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO; ca. 17-14.7 Ma) represents one of several major interruptions in the long-term cooling trend of the past 50 m.y. To date, the processes driving high-amplitude climate variability and sustaining global warmth during this remarkable interval remain highly enigmatic. We present high-resolution benthic foraminiferal and bulk carbonate stable isotope records in an exceptional, continuous, carbonate-rich sedimentary archive (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Site U1337, eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean), which offer a new view of climate evolution over the onset of the MCO. A sharp decline in delta O-18 and delta C-13 at ca. 16.9 Ma, contemporaneous with a massive increase in carbonate dissolution, demonstrates that abrupt warming was coupled to an intense perturbation of the carbon cycle. The rapid recovery in delta C-13 at ca. 16.7 Ma, similar to 250 k.y. after the beginning of the MCO, marks the onset of the first carbon isotope maximum within the long-lasting Monterey Excursion. These results lend support to the notion that atmospheric pCO(2) variations drove profound changes in the global carbon reservoir through the MCO, implying a delicate balance between changing CO2 fluxes, rates of silicate weathering, and global carbon sequestration. Comparison with a high-resolution delta C-13 record spanning the onset of the Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a (similar to 120 m.y. ago) reveals common forcing factors and climatic responses, providing a long-term perspective to understand climate-carbon cycle feedbacks during warmer periods of Earth's climate with markedly different atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据