4.7 Article

Monitoring Shedding of Five Genotypes of RotaTeq Vaccine Viruses by Genotype-Specific Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00035-18

关键词

RotaTeq; genotype; human rotavirus; real-time RT-PCR; rotavirus vaccine; shedding

资金

  1. Public Foundation of the Vaccination Research Center
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [27270201]
  3. Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08947] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RotaTeq (RV5) is a widely used live attenuated pentavalent rotavirus (RV) vaccine. Although fecal shedding of RV vaccine strains persists for long time periods, it is unclear how each vaccine strain replicates in intestinal tissue and is excreted in stool. To examine this issue, we established RV5 genotype-specific realtime reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays. Five real-time RT-PCR assays were designed for the VP7 gene in genotypes G1, G2, G3, G4, and G6. All assays exhibited excellent linearity, and the detection limit was 1 infectious unit (IU)/reaction for G2, G4, and G6 and 10 lUs/reaction for G1 and G3. No cross-reactivity was observed among G genotypes. The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were less than 3%. The assays were used to examine 129 stool samples collected from eight infants who received RVS. In cases 1 and 2, who received three rounds of vaccination, RV shedding decreased gradually with the number of vaccinations. G1 and G6 shedding appeared to be predominant in comparison to shedding of the other genotypes. Patterns of fecal shedding of the five genotypes of vaccine viruses differed between the eight vaccine recipients. RV5 genotype-specific real-time RT-PCR assays will be useful to study the molecular biology of RV5 replication in infants and experimental animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据