4.7 Article

In Vitro Evaluation of BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Bottles and T2Candida Assay for Detection of Candida in the Presence of Antifungals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00471-18

关键词

rapid diagnostics; mycology; azole antifungals; echinocandin antifungals; Candida; diagnostics; blood culture

资金

  1. T2Biosystem, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The T2Candida assay is a novel, non-culture-based assay for the diagnosis of candidemia directly from whole blood. The impact of antifungals on the performance of the T2Candida assay and blood culture bottles has not been well described. In this study, the performance of the T2Candida assay was compared to that of blood culture in detecting Candida spp. in spiked blood cultures with or without the presence of antifungals. Clinical bloodstream isolates of Candida spp. were inoculated into human whole blood at low (1 to 5 cells/ml) and high (10 to 50 cells/ml) concentrations with or without the presence of caspofungin and fluconazole. Time to detection (TTD) was assessed for prepared samples using BacT/Alert FA aerobic blood culture bottles or the T2Candida assay. In the absence of antifungals, T2Candida assay sensitivity was comparable to that of blood culture at both the low inoculum and the high inoculum (95% versus 97.5% and 100% versus 100%, respectively) and the assay had an average TTD that was significantly shorter (5.1 h versus 27.2 to 30 h, respectively). Neither caspofungin nor fluconazole was observed to impact the sensitivity or TTD of the T2Candida assay, while fluconazole reduced the overall blood culture sensitivity by 7.5% to 12.5% (at the low inoculum and high inoculum, respectively) and significantly increased the TTD of Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis by 14.8 to 67 h. Neither caspofungin nor fluconazole impacted the performance of the T2Candida assay in vitro, and the assay may be useful for the diagnosis of candidemia in patients receiving antifungal therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据