4.7 Article

Assessment of pollution levels resulting from biomass gasification

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.05.013

关键词

Producer gas cooling; Condensate; Biomass; Downdraft gasifier

资金

  1. Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In biomass gasification process the producer gas generated can be cleaned by water scrubbing. Some of the organic compounds generated are entrained together with other flue gas dust particles in to the cooling stream. The treatment/disposal of this waste stream remains a challenge because some of the compounds are toxic to humans and the environment. The objective of this study was to assess pollution levels resulting from organic constituents of flue gas filtration in a downdraft gasifier. The study involved assessment of the concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the liquid effluence. The impacts on human health and environment are also discussed and recommendations on measures to minimize the pollution levels are provided. A downdraft gasifier fed with maize cobs was used and condensates were collected by cooling of producer gas. Samples were preserved in a cooler at about 2 degrees C for 24 h before analysis using a capillary gas chromatographer connected to a mass spectrometer (GCMS). The results were that concentrations of: naphthalene was 204.3 mg/m, benzene 17.92 mg/m(3), toluene 182.94 mg/m(3), ethylbenzene 202.43 mg/m(3), 1,2-dimethyl benzene 359.28 mg/m(3) and 1,3+1,4-dimethyl benzene 1016.18 mg/m(3). It was observed that the concentrations of naphthalene and xylene were considerably higher than the recommended permissible exposure limits (PELs) on both human health and the environment. On the other hand, the concentrations of benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were below the PEL. Generally this study indicated that the liquid effluent meets regulatory standards, but it would be interesting to carryout tests with different biomass fuel types which this study recommends. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据