4.8 Article

Eya3 promotes breast tumor-associated immune suppression via threonine phosphatase-mediated PD-L1 upregulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 128, 期 6, 页码 2535-2550

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI96784

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA046934]
  2. NIH [R01-CA095277, R01-CA221282, T32-GM08730, F31-CA189736-01]
  3. Front Range Cancer Challenge Grant
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA095277, R01CA221282, F31CA189736, P30CA046934] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008730] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eya proteins are critical developmental regulators that are highly expressed in embryogenesis but down regulated after development. Amplification and/or re-expression of Eyas occurs in many tumor types. In breast cancer, Eyas regulate tumor progression by acting as transcriptional cofactors and tyrosine phosphatases. Intriguingly, Eyas harbor a separate threonine (Thr) phosphatase activity, which was previously implicated in innate immunity. Here we describe what we believe to be a novel role for Eya 3 in mediating triple-negative breast cancer-associated immune suppression. Eya3 loss decreases tumor growth in immune-competent mice and is associated with increased numbers of infiltrated CD8(+)T cells, which, when depleted, reverse the effects of Eya3 knockdown. Mechanistically, Eya3 utilizes its Thr phosphatase activity to dephosphorylate Myc at pT58, resulting in a stabilized form. We show that Myc is required for Eya 3-mediated increases in PD-L1, and that rescue of PD-L1 in Eya3-knockdown cells restores tumor progression. Finally, we demonstrate that Eya3 significantly correlates with PD-L1 in human breast tumors, and that tumors expressing high levels of Eya 3 have a decreased CD8(+)T cell signature. Our data uncover a role for Eya3 in mediating tumor-associated immune suppression, and suggest that its inhibition may enhance checkpoint therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据