EUS-directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Versus Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Anatomy A Multicenter Early Comparative Experience of Clinical Outcomes

Background and Aims: The standard of care for managing pancreaticobiliary disease in altered Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients is laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LA-ERCP), but is limited by cost and adverse events. Recently a minimally invasive, completely endoscopic approach using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) has been described. We aim to compare EDGE to LA-ERCP in this study. Methods: Patients from May 2005 to June 2017 with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy having undergone LA-ERCP or EDGE at 4 tertiary centers were captured in a registry. Patient demographics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were measured for each group. Results: Seventy-two patients (n=29 EDGE, n=43 LA-ERCP) were included in this study. There was no significant difference in the technical success of EDGE gastrogastric fistula (96.5%) versus LA-gastrostomy creation (100%). The success rate of achieving therapeutic ERCP (EDGE 96.5% vs. LA-ERCP 97.7%) and number of ERCP (EDGE 1.2 vs. LA-ERCP 1.02) needed to achieve clinical resolution was similar between both groups. Adverse event rate for EDGE, 24% (7/29) and LA-ERCP, 19% (8/43) was similar. The total procedure time (73 vs. 184 min) and length of hospital stay (0.8 vs. 2.65 d) was significantly shorter for EDGE compared to LA-ERCP. The overall weight change after EDGE was -6.6 lbs at an average 28-week follow-up. Conclusions: This study suggests that the EDGE procedure has similar technical success and adverse events compared with LA-ERCP with the benefit of significantly shorter procedure times and hospital stay. EDGE may offer a minimally invasive, effective option, with less resource utilization, and without significant weight gain.